Analyst
- View findings
- Yes
- Drill to source
- Yes
- Edit rules
- No
- Approve exceptions
- No
- Release write-back
- No
Across every stage of the platform
The first thing we ask any customer for is data, so the first thing we should be able to explain is exactly how it is handled. Certifications, access model, encryption, residency and audit trail, in the detail your security team will ask for.
An audited information security management system covering the platform, the people who run it and the processes around it.
An independent auditor’s report on our controls for security, availability and confidentiality. Available under NDA.
Prevention deploys on AWS, Azure, GCP or your own private cloud, inside your estate and under your controls.
The default posture
Discover and Assess require read access and nothing else. There is no agent installed in your environment, no schema change in your ERP, no service account with posting rights, and no path by which our analysis can alter a record in your books. Write-back exists only in Prevent, only for the processes you enable, and only for data that has already passed your rules. It is a decision you make later, not a condition of finding out what you are owed.
Discover & AssessRead access
PreventWrite-back
Controls
The controls a finance or security reviewer asks about, described plainly rather than as a list of logos.
Every permission is granted to a role, never to a person directly, and every role is scoped to the narrowest set of data and actions that role actually needs.
Data is encrypted everywhere it sits and everywhere it moves, with keys managed separately from the data they protect.
Auditability is not a reporting feature bolted on afterwards; it is how the platform records its own work, which is what makes findings defensible.
The controls around the people and processes that run the platform, which is the half of ISO 27001 that software alone does not cover.
Role-based access
An illustrative role model. Roles are configured to your organisation; these are the shapes most customers start from, and every one is scoped further by entity, process area and period.
External auditor
Administrator
Note the last two rows. An external auditor gets a scoped, read-only view with full drill-down and no ability to change anything, so you can give evidence access without giving system access. And an administrator who configures roles cannot approve exceptions or release write-back, because whoever controls permissions should never also be able to use them.
Where the data sits
This distinction matters, so we state it rather than hiding behind “cloud agnostic”.
Your systemsDataTwin cloud
Discover & Assess · the diagnostic
You send an extract, we analyse it in our environment, and you get the findings back. Nothing is installed, no infrastructure decision is required, and no change is made to your systems, which is the point of a stage that exists to tell you whether the number is worth acting on. Data residency options are available where a jurisdiction requires it, and retention is agreed before you send anything.
Your ERPPrevent
Prevent · the product
Prevention sits permanently alongside your ERP, so it lives inside your own estate and under your own controls. Cloud agnostic in practice, not just in principle: the same application, deployed to whichever provider your architecture and your regulator require.
Security review
Yes. The ISO 27001 certificate is shareable on request. The SOC 2 report is available under NDA, together with our security pack: architecture overview, sub-processor register, incident response summary, penetration test summary and completed responses to the common questionnaires.
Not for Discover or Assess. Those stages are read-only and cannot alter a record in your systems. Write-back is a Prevent capability, enabled per process, scoped to validated data, and released under a role that is separate from the one that configures rules.
Retention is agreed before you send anything and written into the engagement. If you decide not to proceed after Discover, we delete on request and confirm in writing. Nothing is retained for model training.
No. Your data is used to produce your findings. It is not used to train models, and it is not pooled with other customers’ data. Where the platform learns, it learns within your own tenant from your own corrections and outcomes.
Yes. Roles are scoped by entity, process area, period and data class, so a user in one region can be given access to that region’s data only. This is a common requirement in multi-entity groups and it is configured rather than customised.
We run a documented incident response process with defined severity levels, containment steps and notification commitments. The specific timelines we commit to are stated in the security pack and in the contract rather than promised loosely here.
Access is least-privilege and role-based internally as well. Engineers do not have standing access to customer data; access for support or investigation is time-bound, approved, and logged in the same audit trail you can see.